Brainstorming is a Bowl of Spaghetti:
An In Depth Study of Collaborative Design Process and Creativity Methods with Experienced Design Practitioners

Layda Gongora and Alan Dix

InfoLab21, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK


Paper at International Conference on Design Creativity, ICDC 2010, 29 November - 1 December 2010, Kobe, Japan

Download full paper (PDF, 288K)


Abstract

This article reports the findings of a study which comprised in depth interviews and an excercise using visual aids conducted at Philips research and Technical University Eindhoven in the Netherlands with four designers. The goal of this study was to learn more about how experienced designers interact with creativity tools in collaborative and often multidisciplinary teams in the early brainstorming stages of the design process. Important issues covered in this paper are the role of conversation, cross-disciplinary collaboration, facilitation, the body, planning, reflection and associative thinking as part of the brainstorming process.

Keywords: Conversation, Collaboration, Cross-Disciplinary, Facilitation, Body, Planning, Reflection, Brainstorming, Associative Thinking, Design Methods, Creative Process, Design Process, and Improvisation

References

  1. Ball L.J, & Christensen B.T (2009). Analogical reasoning
    and mental simulation in design: Two strategies linked to
    uncertainty resolution. Design Studies, 20, 169-186.
  2. Bird J, & Stokes D (2006) 'Evolving Minimally Creative
    Robots'. In S. Colton and A. Pease (Eds.)Proceedings of
    the 3rd International Joint Workshop on Computational
    Creativity (ECAI '06), pp. 1-5
  3. Boden M, (2004) The Creative Mind, Routledge, London,
    second edn.
  4. Cross N (2006) Designerly ways of knowing. London:
    Springer-Verlag.
  5. Cross N, Christaans H, and Dorst K, (1996), Analysing
    design activity. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
  6. De Manzano Ö, Cervenka S, Karabanov A, Farde L, Ullén F
    (2010) Thinking Outside a Less Intact Box: Thalamic
    Dopamine D2 Receptor Densities Are Negatively
    Related to Psychometric Creativity in Healthy
    Individuals. PLoS ONE 5(5): e10670.
    doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010670.
  7. Dix, A., Ormerod, T., Twidale, M., Sas, C., Gomes da
    Silva,P., McKnight , L. Why bad ideas are good idea.
    Proceeding of HCI Inventivity 1 (Ireland, 2006) 23-24.
  8. Dix A, (2008) Externalisation – how writing changes
    thinking . Interfaces, 76:18-19.
  9. Dix A. (2010) Human-Computer Interaction: a stable
    discipline, a nascent science, and the growth of the long
    tail. Interacting with Computers, 22(1):13-27.
  10. Flavell JH, (1979) Metacognition and cognitive monitoring:
    A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry.
    American Psychologist, 34:906–911.
  11. Gallagher S, Zahavi D (2007) The Phenomenological Mind:
    An Introduction to Philosophy of Mind and Cognitive
    Science, Routledge.
  12. Gapsevicius, Mindaugus (2006) carpet/?s. www.triple-double-
    u.com
    [Assessed on June,5, 2010].
  13. Garfinkel H, (1966). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Polity
    Press.
  14. Gaver WW, Dunne A, Pacenti E, (1999) Cultural Probes.
    Interactions vi(1):21-29.
  15. Gongora L, (2010) Exploring Creative Process via
    Improvisation and the Design method RePlay,
    DESIRE'10: Creativity and Innovation in Design, Aarhus
    University, Copenhagen, Aug. 2010.
  16. Gibson J., (1979) The Ecological Approach to Visual
    Perception. Lawrence Erlbaum.
  17. Love T. (2010) Re: Life drawing robot offers insight into art,
    design, creativity and aesthetics. PHDDESIGN@
    JISCMAIL.AC.UK. Available from:
    www.jiscmail.ac.uk [Assessed on April,8, 2010].
  18. Ramduny-Ellis D, Hare J, Dix A, Evans M, Gill S, (2010)
    Physicality in Design: an exploration. The Design
    Journal, 13(1):48-76. http://alandix.com/academic/papers/Physicality-in-Design-DJ-2010/
  19. Sawyer K, Group Genius: The Creative Power of
    Collaboration. (San Diego, 2007) Basic Books.
  20. Schön D, (1983) The Reflective Practitioner. How
    professionals think in action, London: Temple Smith.
  21. Schrammel J, Deutsch S, Tscheligi M, (2009) The Visual
    Perception of Tag Clouds Results from an Eye Tracking
    Study. In Proc. of INTERACT 2009, 12th IFIP TC 13
    International Conference
  22. Shneiderman, B. (2000) Creating creativity: user interfaces
    for supporting innovation. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum.
    Interact. 7(1):114-138.
  23. Sternberg RJ, Lubart TI (2002) The Concept of Creativity:
    Prospects and Paradigms. In: Sternberg RJ, editor.
    Handbook of Creativity. New York: Cambridge
    University Press.
  24. Tresset P, Leymarie F.F (2007) The Aikon Project.
    http://www.aikon-gold.com [Assessed on April,8, 2010].
 

 

 

 

 


http://www.hcibook.com/alan/papers/ICDC-2010-spaghetti/

Alan Dix 21/5/2016