Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to offer a reflection on some of the challenges of teaching interaction design. A proposed solution to address these challenges is through a business-driven problem which has been translated into a research question to be tackled by students in their learning context. The case study outlines and evaluates the six stages of this process. Apart from providing the company with research solutions that can be used to improve its profitability, other benefits consist of better teaching/learning process which emphasises learning by doing and involves applying research knowledge and skills in an industrial project. The paper also highlights the lessons learned and the understanding gained into how this approach can be successfully replicated.
Keywords: Interaction design, case study, business-driven project, collaborative design project
REFERENCES
- Crebert, G. (1995, April). Links between higher education and industry. Workplace- based learning programmes in Australia: practices and issues. Keynote address at the Workplace-Based Learning Seminar, Rugby, UK.
- Dix, A, Finlay J, Abowd G and Beale R. (2003). Human-Computer Interaction, 3rd Edition. London: Prentice Hall.
- Hartfield, B., Winograd, T. and Bennett, J. (1992). Learning HCI design: Mentoring project groups in a course on human-computer interaction. SIGCSE Bulletin, 24, 1, 246-251.
- Hodgkinson, G.P., Herriot, P., Anderson, N. (2001). Re-aligning the Stakeholders in Management Research: Lessons from Industrial, Work and Organizational Psychology. British Journal of Management, Dec2001 Supplement 1, Vol. 12, 41-49.
- Howard, S. (1995). User interface design and HCI: identifying the training needs of practitioners. SIGCHI Bulletin, 27(3), ACM, 17-22. http://aei.dest.gov.au/AEI/MIP/ItemsOfInterest/05Interest26c_pdf.pdf
- Kehoe, C. (2001). Supporting Critical Design Dialog, Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. Georgia Institute of Technology.
- Kelvin, A. (1993). Increasing student participation in the learning process. Higher Education. 26(4) 449-470.
- Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as a source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
- Sas, C. (2006). Learning Approaches for Teaching Interaction Design. HCI Educators Workshop.
- Sas, C. (2006). Teaching Interaction Design through Practitioners’ Praxis. Proceedings of the 7th Annual Conference of the Higher Education Academy. poster
- Sas, C. and Dix, A. (2007). Alternative Design Brief for Teaching Interaction Design: Finding New Applications for Existing Technologies. HCI Educators Workshop.
- Schön, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. Jossey Bass, London.
- Starkey, K. and Madan, P. (2001). Bridging the Relevance Gap: Aligning Stakeholders in the Future of Management Research. British Journal of Management 12 (s1), S3–S26.
- Strong, G., Gasen, J.B. Hewett, T., Hix, D., Morris, J., Muller, M.J. and Novick, D.G. (1994). New Directions in HCI Education, Research, and Practice. Washington, DC: NSF/ARPA.
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, E. Souberman (Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Wroblewski, D.A. (1991). The construction of human-computer interfaces considered as a craft. In J. Karat (Ed.), Taking software design seriously (1-19). Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.
|